January 19, 2023
Sondheim's Memory Will Absolutely Be a Blessingby Randi / November 30, 2021The brand new musical Hex is due to open tomorrow night at London’s National Theatre. Given its awesome-sounding premise — it’s a dark musical retelling of the Sleeping Beauty story starring the great Rosalie Craig as the fairy responsible for the curse — I was too excited to wait for opening night. Instead, I saw an early preview and. . .well. . .yeesh. Rather than parroting the fellow audience members we overheard as we left the theatre (“wow what an absolute mess”), I’m going to list some of the questions I hope the creatives can manage to answer before the show is frozen. If these questions can be answered in time, and the holes they address fixed, then there’s a chance this show can be saved. There is so much potential in that elevator pitch, but that potential has unfortunately been left to gather dust with Lorelai’s golf clubs.
Question 2. What was Fairy’s backstory?
This question gets to the big hole in the show. Fairy’s sad history is hinted at throughout — she’s the only fairy left; she has no wings; she was ‘left behind’ by all her brethren — but we never hear a ‘why’ for any of it. What happened to all the other fairies? Why is this weird schizophrenic* childish being the only fairy left in the land? Why is she so messed up? How did she get so messed up? Why can’t she think straight? Did she suffer trauma? Is she supposed to be special for surviving, or is it just dumb luck — or bad luck? How did she lose her wings? Answers to any of these questions would go far to help develop the character in interesting ways: why she’s so weird, why she’s alone, why her story deserves to be told. But we get zilch.
*not using offensively; she legitimately is portrayed as schizophrenic, displaying classic symptoms including but not limited to: hearing voices, having delusions and hallucinations, being unable to communicate effectively, having abnormal motor functioning, neglecting personal hygiene, having useless/excessive movement, exhibiting bizarre posture, &c. Which, actually, forces a Question 2b: Why is Fairy portrayed as schizophrenic???
Question 3. Why didn’t the queen sleep?
My crim law professor used to go through alleged facts and point out where something “didn’t pass the smell test”. I thought of that frequently during this show. Let’s start at the very beginning: The queen has a new baby who refuses to sleep. The entire castle’s staff is exhausted. So, the queen orders a lackey to go find a fairy to put the baby to sleep. Okay, so, if they had already gotten a doctor and the doctor couldn’t do anything – and couldn’t find anything wrong with the baby underlying the wakefulness – why not just have the staff rotate caring for the baby? I don’t buy that this self-absorbed (annoying, very panto) queen hadn’t slept. She surely would have go to bed in far away quarters each night and left her staff to watch the baby. (And also, if there’s nothing medically wrong, why turn to black magic? But that would undo the whole myth, so whatever.)
Question 4. What urged Fairy’s hex?
An interesting new aspect of this story is the notion that fairies are supposed to only ‘bless’ (give magical favors that the person being blessed actively wants), rather than ‘hex’ (put magic on a person that they don’t want). She found that the baby didn’t want to sleep, and as a result the fairy didn’t want to force the baby to sleep as that would be a hex. (Drink!) Fairy said the baby would sleep when she was tired, i.e. when she wanted to sleep. This wasn’t good enough for the royal family, and they ‘forced’ Fairy to hex the baby to sleep. The forcing made Fairy so. . . something, that she hexed the baby to sleep unendingly once she gets pricked by a thorn (until, of course, the true love’s kiss). But this huge pivotal moment of the story was rushed through so it was unclear why Fairy did such a hex. Yes she was being held captive and she was clearly stressed out, but what made her think of this specific, peculiar curse with all its random details? Why not hex the people who are actually assaulting her, capturing her? Why not put the baby to sleep then and there? Why do such a bizarre hex? Literally one line supporting her action, revealing anything about her mindset, would have been good. Her decision here is the entire foundation of this story, so it needed to be supported at least a little. I keep seeing Michael in The Good Place waving his hand and saying ‘don’t worry about it’ in response to questions.
Question 5. What happened to the staff?
The baby, Rose, grew up sheltered in an attempt to prevent her from ever being pricked by a thorn. But that day finally came when she was a teen, and she fell into her hexed sleep. Rose woke up after 100 years, ostensibly having long been alone in the castle. No one else was there. Did the existing staff really abandon this cursed princess? There was no plan put in place by previous royals to continue keeping watch over this child throughout her slumber, throughout the subsequent generations? I don’t buy that at all! That’s so irresponsible! Abolish the monarchy!
Question 6. Are the murderous thorns supposed to be funny?
The personified ‘thorns’ who pricked Rose to sleep then set about pricking every single prince who tries to enter the kingdom to lift the curse, sending them into long-term sleep as well. (Though it seems at first like straight up murder.) This whole segment is done like a creepier murdery-er version of the Oompa Loompa songs but it’s also clearly supposed to be funny. I found it so cringey. So much murderous energy. So much of an annoying song. So much time devoted to these giant murderous thorns who want to put everyone who crosses their path to sleep forever?? I hated it.
Question 7. How did Rose know wassup?
When Bert* wakes Rose up and they immediately seem to love each other, how did Rose — who has been asleep 100 years and before that lived a completely sheltered childhood to prevent the cursed (two syllables) thorn prick — seem totally in the know about love and sex and I don’t know IMMEDIATELY HAVING TWO BABIES?? She would be a total Nell ta ta, not a regular modern teen who is totally chill with becoming a teen mom with no support system.
*Question 7b. What kind of name for a prince is Bert?
Question 8. What’s going on with the music?
With each of the songs, I struggled to get a handle on what was happening. Instead of a cohesive single song (let alone cohesive score), each movement felt like different groups of small musical phrases smashed together, never coalescing into actual songs with melodies, or foundations, or points. It was a very strange chaotic experience, to think you grasp what a song sounds like and what it’s doing and then have it keep shifting away from you musically, in a lawless deranged way rather than a creative way. And there was so much of the modern pop vocalizing/shrieking/riffing instead of legitimate singing, a trend I truly despise. Of course Rosalie sounds wonderful but her talents are not given enough to work with.
Question 9. Why was the whole second act focusing on the ogre grandmother eating her grandchildren?
This was where every audience member I could see was imitating my favorite little blonde toddler girl gif, you know the one. The action shifted to focus entirely on the ogre queen wanting to eat her grandkids and being unable to control herself. Why, just so much why. Why didn’t Fairy tell Rose that the ogre was after her babies and would probably kill her too and urge her to GTFO RIGHT NOW? Instead Fairy killed some animals to trick the queen into believing she was eating the babies. Is Fairy that inept, that much a bumbling fool? It was insufferable. Why didn’t she just say RUN instead of cowering with the babies? It took a helluva lot more time to hunt down the goat and the rabbit and whatever it was (NOT great sound effects of slaughter btw, could definitely have done without that awful harrowing bullshit) than it would have to just shove the babies into the arms of their mother and shove them all out the door.
Question 10. Why don’t the book and score match up?
My biggest problem (okay they’re all the biggest) was that the book didn’t make sense on its own, and then the song lyrics didn’t match the book/action at all. It reminded me of the Broadway flop A Tale of Two Cities. In that show, this powerful supporting character spends the whole show wanting to get revenge for her brother, and then in Act II sings her big number, the main lyric of which was ‘out of sight, out of mind.’ Which had exactly zero to do with her character’s situation or the need for revenge for her brother. It was like, wtf?? That’s not what’s happening here, that’s not what you’ve been saying? I thought of that during this show.
Specific songs:
– Bert’s song was both indecipherable and also a heroic pomp-y song but in a creepy minor key. Why that key if it’s supposed to be a pump-up song? It didn’t fit to introduce the character.
– The opening song of Act II, with all the suitors singing about maybe one day finally being the one or one day it’ll be me or maybe this time or whatever, made no sense. These people also just woke up from decades being cursed asleep, and their first thought is about one day winning? getting the prize? (the princess? gross) and not about ‘oh my god where is my family, where is my home, do I not have a home anymore? how many years of my life did I miss?’ What do you mean one day it’ll be you, do you know you just woke up from like 80 years asleep? You just got a miracle second chance done on you and you’re complaining about the before times? Go see about your life, men! Make it make sense.
– The big climactic song about how everyone is different on the outside vs the inside was the greatest example of the aforementioned Tale of Two Cities illogicality. The lyrics do not reflect what had been told in the story. Rose says she’s smart on the outside? She has not lived at all and left two babies unattended for an ogre to catch! Bert says on the outside he’s seen as a hero? He hasn’t done shit heroically yet! No one thinks you’re a hero! Worst of all, the ogre who just thought she happily ate her grandbabies says that she is going to start being true to herself. BEING TRUE TO YOURSELF IS EATING BABIES! You need to work to NOT be true to yourself!!!
Question 11: Why is the promising Rose and Bert conflict treated like an afterthought?
The Rose and Bert conflict is infuriatingly done. He doesn’t believe what Rose says about his mother – that she’s an ogre and so on – and he NEVER DOES believe her, not until his mother reveals the truth herself. Yet afterward, Rose is the one to run after him to apologize, leaving her babies unattended. I mean I guess that’s all believable for an 18-year-old who just woke up but I don’t think it was presented in that way. It seemed actually presented as her needing to apologize to him, which is absolutely bonkers. And it all seemed secondary to Fairy trembling and wincing around the stage and also wanting to be friends with the ogre? When did the ogre become her best friend? See so many questions.
The most frustrating part of this show (okay it’s all the most frustrating part) is that in this climactic segment, instead of having a song about Rose and Bert’s conflict and giving some character depth and development through song as musicals are supposed to do, they give us a silly R&B song for the suitors that lifts right out. Another point in the panto column.
Question 11b: Why does Rose consider the suitors, who she never met until right now, her best friends? They have all been asleep and never met before.
I have more questions, like why is the humor geared to the lowest common denominator? why are there so many elements that evidence a favoring of panto over the musical art form? is this for kids or adults? but I’ve asked enough. With some work, it would be a decent show – it has so much promise in that premise. But it’s presented as though the creatives don’t believe in the premise and instead stuff the hours with low-grade jokes, unfinished sentences, and mere sketches of characters. Hex was unfortunately tonally confused and sloppy. I hope there is time to answer these questions before the show is set so that it can try to find its proper footing.
INFORMATION
Hex opens Wednesday December 15 at the National Theatre. At my performance, Act I ran from 7:20 to 8:38, Act II ended at 9:55. Hilariously, the placards outside the doors said the run time was 2 hours 34 minutes, a mind-boggling specificity that I will never understand the point of announcing.
Related Posts
Golden Globes 2019: The Annual Shitshow is Back So Let’s Make Some More Shit Up
It’s officially my favorite season – awards season! This evening, January 6, brings us another round of the favorite game of the world’s most inane entertainment reporters: The Golden Globes. It’s that thing where the Hollywood Foreign Press Association nominates their favorite celebrities (or celeb spouses, banking on the other half showing up to their party) that happen to be in movies or television this year for whatever awards they can squeeze them into and then they sit back and laugh as the categories and often winners make no real sense and you’re like excuse me what but no one actually cares at all because even though it’s nonsense the Globes are the most enjoyable awards show of the season and everyone is drunk and laughing the whole time so there’s no real harm done, except to the sanctity of awards for famous people which, like, isn’t that important to sanctify in the scheme of things, you know?
The Hollywood Foreign Press Association is notorious for their ludicrous decisions and inability to discern comedy from drama, making the Golden Globes the most nonsensical awards of the season, but they’re the most fun, mainly because of the open bar. The A-list crowd lets loose and has a gay old time. Nothing makes me more jealous in the world of Hollywood than watching all the celebrities get up from their tables and chat with all the other celebrities during commercial breaks and then not give a shit about getting back to their seats in time after the breaks end because no one cares if the rough and ready rodeo that is this event appears a tiny drop less professional than it already does (would it even register?).
The truest golden years were when Amy Poehler and Tina Fey hosted, providing funnier comedy in their 10-minute opening monologues than any of the Best Comedy movie nominations had – mostly because the movies in the best comedy category are never actually comedies. (HELLOOO I mean ‘The Martian’? ‘Ladybird’? Forking ‘GET OUT’???? HFPA YOU F-ING CRAZY? Oh, right, yes.) I have reservations about tonight’s hosts, Andy Samberg and Sandra Oh, because they clearly were chosen after every famous person’s name was put on little slips of paper and then into a hat and then also inside the hat was a drunk rabbit (it was a magician’s hat) and he ate the pieces of paper and then threw it all back up and they chose the names on the first two slips that came back, that’s the only way this pairing makes sense. I mean ostensibly it’s because they were charming when they presented at the Emmys back in September but taking that great little presenting performance and thinking it will translate to great success as hosts of an entire show is what got us ‘Get Him to the Greek’ after people loved Russell Brand’s (incredible) small performance in ‘Forgetting Sarah Marshall’. I also can’t help but think that, even though I do love Andy, it’s like no one in charge would be okay with having a woman of color on that stage without a safe white man to keep viewers from throwing their TVs out the window. The powers that be are like ‘don’t be mad that we’re showing you a lady in charge, or a non-white! There’s a white man, see, everything’s okay!’ I wish them well though, and maybe we can get Tina and Amy back for the Oscars if the heads over there are ever able to look past f-ing Kevin Hart. Like why do they think he is the only option??
So, to recap, no one takes the Globes seriously, but it’s still fun to watch. And none of the celebrities take it seriously either but some of them (especially/only the newcomers) will still cry when they win because, well, winning rocks, like why I care that my team wins Quizzo every week even though the prize is money to the very same bar where the quiz occurs and I don’t drink so like, I don’t actually get anything out of it but I still get to say I FORKING WON, you know, and so the Globes is that, just like that. Anyway it’s really hard to see everything in time since I’m in London so we are going to do our best with these thoughts and predictions. Some of you long-time readers might be like ‘wait where’s you amazing list of reviews for every important movie’ and may I remind you that that comes out before the Oscars, where the movies actually matter/when I have had more time to account for the stupid later UK release dates.
The truest golden years were when Amy Poehler and Tina Fey hosted, providing funnier comedy in their 10-minute opening monologues than any of the Best Comedy movie nominations had – mostly because the movies in the best comedy category are never actually comedies. (HELLOOO I mean ‘The Martian’? ‘Ladybird’? Forking ‘GET OUT’???? HFPA YOU F-ING CRAZY? Oh, right, yes.) I have reservations about tonight’s hosts, Andy Samberg and Sandra Oh, because they clearly were chosen after every famous person’s name was put on little slips of paper and then into a hat and then also inside the hat was a drunk rabbit (it was a magician’s hat) and he ate the pieces of paper and then threw it all back up and they chose the names on the first two slips that came back, that’s the only way this pairing makes sense. I mean ostensibly it’s because they were charming when they presented at the Emmys back in September but taking that great little presenting performance and thinking it will translate to great success as hosts of an entire show is what got us ‘Get Him to the Greek’ after people loved Russell Brand’s (incredible) small performance in ‘Forgetting Sarah Marshall’. I also can’t help but think that, even though I do love Andy, it’s like no one in charge would be okay with having a woman of color on that stage without a safe white man to keep viewers from throwing their TVs out the window. The powers that be are like ‘don’t be mad that we’re showing you a lady in charge, or a non-white! There’s a white man, see, everything’s okay!’ I wish them well though, and maybe we can get Tina and Amy back for the Oscars if the heads over there are ever able to look past f-ing Kevin Hart. Like why do they think he is the only option??
So, to recap, no one takes the Globes seriously, but it’s still fun to watch. And none of the celebrities take it seriously either but some of them (especially/only the newcomers) will still cry when they win because, well, winning rocks, like why I care that my team wins Quizzo every week even though the prize is money to the very same bar where the quiz occurs and I don’t drink so like, I don’t actually get anything out of it but I still get to say I FORKING WON, you know, and so the Globes is that, just like that. Anyway it’s really hard to see everything in time since I’m in London so we are going to do our best with these thoughts and predictions. Some of you long-time readers might be like ‘wait where’s you amazing list of reviews for every important movie’ and may I remind you that that comes out before the Oscars, where the movies actually matter/when I have had more time to account for the stupid later UK release dates.
|
BEST MOTION PICTURE,
DRAMA A Star is Born Black Panther BlacKkKlansmen Bohemian Rhapsody If Beale Street Could Talk |
BEST MOTION PICTURE,
COMEDY/MUSICAL Crazy Rich Asians The Favourite Green Book Mary Poppins Returns Vice |
Jesus take the damn wheel. The biggest problems of the Globes usually come from them trying desperately to shove enough dramatic movies into the Comedy/Musical category and nothing about it making any sense at all, to the point where it’s almost offensive. AND YET, in a year where there are movies that could easily be argued into the category, they go ‘nah, we cool’ and put them in the Drama category! What the hell, guys? Two of the biggest and best movies of the year, ‘A Star is Born’ and ‘Bohemian Rhapsody’, are about musicians, and they play music like THE WHOLE TIME, yet the HFPA has them in Drama. For a group that just a few years ago was like, “oh Matt Damon is listening to music while trapped on Mars and he makes a funny joke so it’s clearly a comedy and/or a musical”, the HFPA is having all sorts of identity crises. It’s kind of hilarious that the two giant musical biopics aren’t in the musical category. Like you HAVE one; USE it! I’m also semi-shocked they didn’t try to put the big budget superhero movie ‘Black Panther’ in comedy as well, since they usually consider anything that isn’t about war a comedy. ‘BlacKkKlansmen’ was actually the movie that made us laugh the most of any of these, so even though it would be a little whack if someone with any gravitas to their name said it was a comedy, the HFPA absolutely could have put it in C/M and no one would have batted an eye. I am actually 80% certain that they took their overall 10 favorite films (how, though) and put them through the same aforementioned sorting system that they used for choosing the hosts. (*Okay, I know some of you have had it up to here with my railing on the HFPA’s sense of what’s drama and what’s comedy when you know that it’s actually the makers of ‘Bohemian’ and ‘Star’ that petitioned for them to be in Drama. But a) it shouldn’t be up to the filmmakers to say what their thing gets nominated for just because Drama is more prestigious; that’s some bullshit finagling, and b) the HFPA makes crazy decisions every single year so I’m never going to ease up just because someone else is also to blame. Also FUCK the people who wanted them to be in Drama because it’s more prestigious than Comedy. It’s not the MUSICAL COMEDY category; it’s Comedy OR Musical. SLASH MEANS OR. Miss me with the bullshit that dramas are more important than musicals.)
As for the actual Comedy/Musical category, the only great surprise is ‘Crazy Rich Asians’, which deserves the slot and is actually a comedy, so well done to the HFPA. This is the perfect maneuver for the HFPA to get big names of the year, but from non-awardsy movies, to come to their party. ‘The Favourite’ was a great movie and it’s billed as a dark comedy, though to me it was more horrifying and full of nervous laughter, but I concede that it’s the right kind of movie for this category. That Yorgos though! ‘Mary Poppins Returns’ shouldn’t be on this list, not because it wasn’t a musical, which it is, but because it was not good. Most disappointing movie of the year for me. There are 100 movies that should have taken that slot, but none with Emily Blunt and Lin-Manuel Miranda, who the journos wanted to invite, so here we are. Party’s not a party without Lin! As for ‘Green Book’ and ‘Vice’, they should be swapped (with the two musical biopics) to the drama category. I have it on good authority that ‘Green Book’ is clearly a drama. And I guess the foreign reporters find it funny to make fun of America’s downfall so they are calling ‘Vice’ a comedy even though it’s upsetting and depressing? I guess.
Given that these categories are bonkers, it’s hard to pick winners. For ‘Drama’, my vote would be for ‘A Star is Born’, and the Globes seem like the right venue for rewarding that starry successful film. Everyone loves it (I know I know except for two of you reading this, I get it, you hated it) and it was completely wonderful, and it doesn’t hurt that it was a financial hit. For ‘Comedy/Musical’, I think it will be ‘The Favourite’ because it’s actually a dark comedy, it’s a pretty great (though WEIRD AF) movie, and the foreigners voting love them some Yorgos and some Olivia Colman.
As for the actual Comedy/Musical category, the only great surprise is ‘Crazy Rich Asians’, which deserves the slot and is actually a comedy, so well done to the HFPA. This is the perfect maneuver for the HFPA to get big names of the year, but from non-awardsy movies, to come to their party. ‘The Favourite’ was a great movie and it’s billed as a dark comedy, though to me it was more horrifying and full of nervous laughter, but I concede that it’s the right kind of movie for this category. That Yorgos though! ‘Mary Poppins Returns’ shouldn’t be on this list, not because it wasn’t a musical, which it is, but because it was not good. Most disappointing movie of the year for me. There are 100 movies that should have taken that slot, but none with Emily Blunt and Lin-Manuel Miranda, who the journos wanted to invite, so here we are. Party’s not a party without Lin! As for ‘Green Book’ and ‘Vice’, they should be swapped (with the two musical biopics) to the drama category. I have it on good authority that ‘Green Book’ is clearly a drama. And I guess the foreign reporters find it funny to make fun of America’s downfall so they are calling ‘Vice’ a comedy even though it’s upsetting and depressing? I guess.
Given that these categories are bonkers, it’s hard to pick winners. For ‘Drama’, my vote would be for ‘A Star is Born’, and the Globes seem like the right venue for rewarding that starry successful film. Everyone loves it (I know I know except for two of you reading this, I get it, you hated it) and it was completely wonderful, and it doesn’t hurt that it was a financial hit. For ‘Comedy/Musical’, I think it will be ‘The Favourite’ because it’s actually a dark comedy, it’s a pretty great (though WEIRD AF) movie, and the foreigners voting love them some Yorgos and some Olivia Colman.
BEST ACTRESS IN A MOTION PICTURE – DRAMA
Glenn Close, “The Wife”
Lady Gaga, “A Star Is Born”
Nicole Kidman, “Destroyer”
Melissa McCarthy, “Can You Ever Forgive Me?”
Rosamund Pike, “A Private War”
Glenn Close, “The Wife”
Lady Gaga, “A Star Is Born”
Nicole Kidman, “Destroyer”
Melissa McCarthy, “Can You Ever Forgive Me?”
Rosamund Pike, “A Private War”
Lady Gaga is almost hundo p going to win her second Golden Globe on her second nomination (that’s a kind of ridiculous track record for someone who isn’t actually a great actress but has been great in specific parts). Her Allie was magnetic, and it helps that it was her singing so incredibly (something that might hurt Rami Malek). I haven’t seen ‘The Wife’ because it looks suuupes boring, but Glenn Close is probably her closest competitor because everyone loves Glenn Close (except Patti LuPone) and I’m sure she was wonderful in the movie and she’s always great so, okay, possible dark horse. No one has seen Nikki K’s movie, which I’m assuming is about Alison Brie’s Zoya character on ‘Glow’?? I would indeed love a big-screen look at that magnificence, although I can’t imagine it being any better than ‘Glow’ episode 2.8 (The Good Twin) (that’s the one where Alison Brie’s Ruth also plays the evil twin of her Russian character and it’s amazing and there’s a goat). Melissa McCarthy is supposed to be amazing in her movie but I wouldn’t know because London doesn’t seem to have heard about it. I just checked the UK release date and it’s forking February 1! What is this NONSENSE. Show me my Sookie in a crime drama! And as for Rosamund, she’s not winning because voters and people the world over are still terrified of her after ‘Gone Girl’. Like really forking terrified. They didn’t even want her to come but they had to invite her because they were scared of what would happen if they didn’t.
BEST ACTOR IN A MOTION PICTURE – DRAMA
Bradley Cooper, “A Star Is Born”
Willem Dafoe, “At Eternity’s Gate”
Lucas Hedges, “Boy Erased”
Rami Malek, “Bohemian Rhapsody”
John David Washington, “BlacKkKlansman”
Bradley Cooper, “A Star Is Born”
Willem Dafoe, “At Eternity’s Gate”
Lucas Hedges, “Boy Erased”
Rami Malek, “Bohemian Rhapsody”
John David Washington, “BlacKkKlansman”
Oh this is not even a question; it’s Bradley’s to lose. The HFPA LOOOOOVES them some Bradley Cooper, possibly even more than Sidra thinks Italian men loooooove them some black women (every piece I write has to have a reference to ‘Love & Basketball’, you know this by now, yes?), and he deserves it too. He dedicated so much time and effort to ‘A Star is Born’, including spending two years working with a vocal coach to safely lower his speaking voice so he could play Jackson, the alcoholic country star. And he can sing (well enough)! And then he directed the whole darn thing flawlessly. This is the way they will reward him for making this great movie. The potential spoiler is Rami Malek, who the HFPA also loves. Malek was superb as Freddie Mercury, but the fact that it wasn’t him singing but it was Bradley could be the tipping point. Willem Dafoe is supposed to be great in ‘At Eternity’s Gate’ and I would love for him to win, now or in the future, because he is such a nice man even though he looks like a mean one, but I can’t say that he should win because I have not seen the film, nor has anyone. Lucas Hedges is too young to be nominated for so many awards already jesus h christ who is this kid in Oscar movies every g-d year! And in Tony-nominated plays too! Take a BREAK, child. No he’s really great but he has decades and probably hundos of awards ahead of him. Washington was great as the understated lead of ‘BlacKkKlansmen’, but he was subtle, which-ah the foreigners hate-ah!
BEST ACTRESS IN A MOTION PICTURE – MUSICAL OR COMEDY
Emily Blunt, “Mary Poppins Returns”
Olivia Colman, “The Favourite”
Elsie Fisher, “Eighth Grade”
Charlize Theron, “Tully”
Constance Wu, “Crazy Rich Asians”
Emily Blunt, “Mary Poppins Returns”
Olivia Colman, “The Favourite”
Elsie Fisher, “Eighth Grade”
Charlize Theron, “Tully”
Constance Wu, “Crazy Rich Asians”
I think Olivia Colman’s Globe win might be the surest bet of all, after Gaga’s win for Best Song (I’M IN THE DEEEEP EEEEEEEND WATCH AS I DIIIIIIIIIIIVE IIIIIIIIIIIN you’re welcome best song ever). Everyone is loving ‘The Favourite’ (WEIRD AF) and Colman has been diligently producing great but under-noticed work for decades. Most importantly, her excellent performance as Queen Anne is the only one on the list with any serious credibility or weight to it, in the only movie on the list that will be nominated for Best Picture at the Oscars. Fork she was creepy and super disturbing (and did I say WEIRD AF) and great in ‘The Favourite’. Emily Blunt was one of the few things I enjoyed about Mary Poppins, though she wasn’t award-worthy, just like, not bad enough to yell at the screen like I did for Meryl Streep’s scene. Is ‘Tully’ the movie Charlize did like 10 years ago when she ghost-writes teen novels? I’m going to assume that’s what it is so why is it nominated now? It was a bad movie back then. Constance Wu was charming and wonderful but she will have to be content with all the crazy money the movie made (though not as much money as her character was marrying into apparently (billionaires are immoral by definition btw, I hope the sequel comes to terms with that)). ‘Eighth Grade’ is the movie I actually most wanted to see this year but I completely missed its run in the UK (if it had one). I heard such great things and would have liked to see more recognition of it, mostly because Bo Burnham actually seems like a fantastic person (all of this is taken from his one appearance on the Anna Faris podcast, but he did say a lot of great things on it). So yeah, Olivia Colman gets my vote for sure. Although, interestingly, I don’t think it is an Oscar-worthy performance. We’ll talk about that in a month I guess.
BEST ACTOR IN A MOTION PICTURE – MUSICAL OR COMEDY
Christian Bale, “Vice”
Lin-Manuel Miranda, “Mary Poppins Returns”
Viggo Mortensen, “Green Book”
Robert Redford, “The Old Man & the Gun”
John C. Reilly, “Stan & Ollie”
Christian Bale, “Vice”
Lin-Manuel Miranda, “Mary Poppins Returns”
Viggo Mortensen, “Green Book”
Robert Redford, “The Old Man & the Gun”
John C. Reilly, “Stan & Ollie”
This is the funniest category. It is exactly what one of those bots fed 1000 hours of x kind of information would create if asked to create a sample Globes category. A few relevant movies plus big name movie stars plus people they just really like plus roles you would never have dreamed of getting award recognition. I just love it. Viggo should be in the Drama category, Christian Bale arguably too, but one of them will be the winner. I’m not sure about the Old Robert Gun movie because I haven’t seen it yet, but everyone loves Redford. Everyone also loves Lin and so I can’t fault his inclusion in this category, except I can because hahaha for Mary Poppinses?? Oh dear. Love John C. Reilly as well but if he didn’t win for ‘Chicago’ he shouldn’t win for ‘Stan & Ollie’, which I think is about those muppet hecklers? This is almost a definite win for Christian Bale, though I honestly wouldn’t be surprised if they gave it to Lin just because the Globes be crazy.
BEST ACTRESS IN A SUPPORTING ROLE IN ANY MOTION PICTURE
Amy Adams, ‘Vice’
Claire Foy, ‘First Man’
Regina King, ‘If Beale Street Could Talk’
Emma Stone, ‘The Favourite’
Rachel Weisz, ‘The Favourite’
Amy Adams, ‘Vice’
Claire Foy, ‘First Man’
Regina King, ‘If Beale Street Could Talk’
Emma Stone, ‘The Favourite’
Rachel Weisz, ‘The Favourite’
WILL AMY ADAMS EVER WIN AN AWARD? Okay she has won two Globes but she is one of the best actresses to still not have won an Oscar. Maybe this will start her season off right! Although who wants her first Oscar to be for the monster Lynne Cheney YEESH. This is a great category overall though. I do have a sneaking sense that one of ‘The Favourite’ girls will sneak in to upset the Adams train. The HFPA loves Emma and Rachel and they were great in it, so maybe one of them will dark horse this up. But I think it’s Amy’s. She will be so happy!
BEST ACTOR IN A SUPPORTING ROLE IN ANY MOTION PICTURE
Mahershala Ali, ‘Green Book’
Timothee Chalamet, ‘Beautiful Boy’
Adam Driver, ‘BlacKkKlansmen’
Richard E. Grant, “Can You Ever Forgive Me?’
Sam Rockwell, ‘Vice’
Mahershala Ali, ‘Green Book’
Timothee Chalamet, ‘Beautiful Boy’
Adam Driver, ‘BlacKkKlansmen’
Richard E. Grant, “Can You Ever Forgive Me?’
Sam Rockwell, ‘Vice’
I can’t believe I already used my ‘WHO IS THIS CHILD IN THE BIG MOVIES EVERY YEAR EVEN THOUGH HE’S NOT OLD ENOUGH TO SEE THEM YET’ diatribe on Lucas Hedges when we have Chalamet in the mix! god what is UP with these little boys being such damn good actors? I love Chalamet (not as much as John Mulaney’s wife does but enough) but BB is too depressing for anyone to still think about. He has a long illustrious career ahead of him, I am sure. Adam Driver’s career is like nothing anyone could have predicted, I guess I’m happy for him, but he will have to be satisfied with Star Wars money. I’ve heard great things about Grant and I could see this being the category the voters throw a curveball into, but the race is mainly between Mahershala and Sam. Both are the big recent Supporting Actor winners of the last two seasons, which will make some voters want to spread the wealth, but Mahershala actually didn’t win the Globe for ‘Moonlight’ (the Globes like to throw curveballs like I said! (of course their curveball that year in his category was to my most hated movie ever made so that’s fun) (we shall not be naming it)) so this is most likely his.
BEST DIRECTOR
Bradley Cooper, ‘A Star is Born’
Alfonso Cuaron, ‘Roma’
Peter Farrelly, ‘Green Book’
Spike Lee, ‘BlacKkKlansmen’
Adam McKay, ‘Vice’
Bradley Cooper, ‘A Star is Born’
Alfonso Cuaron, ‘Roma’
Peter Farrelly, ‘Green Book’
Spike Lee, ‘BlacKkKlansmen’
Adam McKay, ‘Vice’
The best director race is mainly between Bradley and Cuaron, two men the voters adore for very different reasons. If Bradley is awarded for Best Actor, then this one will go to Cuaron. It is most likely Cuaron’s anyway as a way to compensate ‘Roma’, one of the most beloved movies of the year, for being shut out of the Best Movie categories because it’s not in English (thems the rules), which is some real bullshit considering these are the awards from the Hollywood FOREIGN Press, the awarding organization most likely to recognize that things in languages other than English have merit considering I would bet money that every single member speaks at least one non-English language. Way to buck the stereotype (of being learned), guys. But either/any/all would be deserving winners. I’d love if Spike Lee won just for having the balls to end his film as he did, which was the most moving and upsetting part.
Okay I was so proud of myself for finishing that I completely forgot I have to write about television too! Goddammit the Globes are like this website, trying to cover way too much! You’d think that my being in the UK would make it even harder for me to see all the American-focused television nominated at the Globes than it is for me to see all the movies, but you would be wrong. I watch a lot of TV.
BEST DRAMA SERIES
The Americans
Bodyguard
Homecoming
Killing Eve
Pose
The Americans
Bodyguard
Homecoming
Killing Eve
Pose
This is a really interesting group of shows, all at least decent. The Americans is one of the best dramas in history, and it should be awarded for its final, impeccable season. I still cry sometimes thinking about the garage scene and poor Stanny Beems. But it won’t win, because the damn foreign press loves Killing Eve and loooves Sandra Oh – and she is HOSTING. She is going to win (see below) and this show is going to win, even though (my mom is going to be mad) it was JUST OKAY. I think the premise of Killing Eve had a shittonne of potential, but they didn’t actually fulfill it. The writing and the storyline got kind of out of whack halfway through, and though it was always entertaining, it wasn’t great, and it definitely wasn’t ‘best’. Be best! Bodyguard gets a similar review. It was one of the most riveting shows I’ve ever watched – I was on edge the entire time, heart racing. They achieved levels of suspense that are usually reserved for movie-making. But while it was super successful in that regard, it was overall a B level series, with some groan-worthy turns and some just-okay writing. The Americans is the best show on this list by a mile, but it won’t beat the British shows. The Globes never actually reward the best of TV though, just the people and properties they like talking about, so it’s fine, I’m fine, we’re all fiiiine.
BEST TV DRAMA ACTOR
Jason Bateman, Ozark
Stephan James, Homecoming
Richard Madden, Bodyguard
Billy Porter, Pose
Matthew Rhys, The Americans
Jason Bateman, Ozark
Stephan James, Homecoming
Richard Madden, Bodyguard
Billy Porter, Pose
Matthew Rhys, The Americans
YAS BILLY PORTER COME THROUGH!!! I mean not actually ‘through’ like ‘to the winner’s podium’, just like hooray for the nom, I adore you you Tony winner! But not as much as Matthew Rhys with his WELSH ACCENT that NO VIEWERS of The Americans would EVER have guessed he had. Loves it! There are great performers on this list but no one touches Matthew’s performance, especially in the last episode of The Americans. Dammit that show was incredible, and he was the best part, other than my aforementioned main man Stanny Beems. I hope he wins, and he might ride his Emmy-award momentum to a win here. But I wouldn’t be surprised if Richard Madden pulled ahead, because he was on yet another acclaimed show but this time it’s British and they love that.
BEST TV DRAMA ACTRESS
Caitriona Balfe, Outlander
Elisabeth Moss, The Handmaid’s Tale
Sandra Oh, Killing Eve
Julia Roberts, Homecoming
Keri Russell, The Americans
Caitriona Balfe, Outlander
Elisabeth Moss, The Handmaid’s Tale
Sandra Oh, Killing Eve
Julia Roberts, Homecoming
Keri Russell, The Americans
Can’t believe The Handmaid’s Tale is still on; it feels like it’s been on for ten seasons already, or maybe that’s just because real life in America feels like that now. Regardless, this is Oh’s. Oh, no. Keri Russell gets all the same praise I gave Matthew Rhys, supra, because they were two halves of a whole that built a gripping, poignant, masterpiece of a show. This should be hers (just like the Emmy should have been) but this is Sandra’s. I mean she’s the g-d host, for crying out loud. Ain’t no way they’re gonna get her to host and then not give her a trophy for it. The only way I can see Sandra losing is if the voters decide to give it to Julia Roberts, because she’s forking Julia Roberts and they are probably peeing in their pants excited to see her tonight. I mean she’s also great, yes, but the HFPA only cares that she is Julia mufuhing Roberts.
BEST COMEDY SERIES
Barry
The Good Place
Kidding
The Kominsky Method
The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel
Barry
The Good Place
Kidding
The Kominsky Method
The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel
Are they just kidding about Kidding, and Komisky? Don’t get me wrong, I love The Kominsky Method because I enjoy many properties that are intended for elderly Jews (am one at heart!), but while it’s entertaining, it’s not like, great. But happily, three of these noms are indeed three of the best comedies on right now: Maisel, Barry, and The Good Place. I’m going to take a minute to talk about the best of those three, which means it’s the best show out right now ever in the whole entire world and guess what also in the entire history of television: The Good Place. TGP has created a unique sitcom, which seems like an impossible thing to do. Not just in terms of the subject matter, but in terms of structure. With almost every single episode, it turns the show’s universe on its head with twists and surprises that are usually reserved for season finales. And it doesn’t just do that for the sake of doing something different or unexpected: it actually best serves the show. It teaches viewers about philosophy and all the important thinkers of history while simultaneously having some of the dumbest humor (in the best way) ever. Every performance is pitch perfect, and trying to pick a favorite or a best is like trying to pick the cutest doggo. Which is probably why only one of the very deserving performers is nominated for a Globe; they just couldn’t deal with how great everyone is and giving the others Globes is like kind of a slap in the face for how good they are and how many better things they deserve for being amazing. If Mike Schur’s humor is on the same wavelength as yours, you feel like he created this show exactly tuned to your preferences, and it’s THE GREATEST feeling to have that in existence. But it’s not going to win because WE’RE IN THE BAD PLACE, but also because no one can stop the Maisel train. I do truly love Maisel, and I wish the costumer would just give me all the forking clothes on that show, god damn they’re amazing, and it is a deserving winner. Barry is also great, even though I am super stressed out while watching it because ahhh, assassins and what not. I expect the HFPA to give it to Maisel, though I wouldn’t be surprised if Barry won, or honestly Kominsky because they love doing crazy shit and they love the old cockers on that show.
BEST TV COMEDY ACTOR
Michael Douglas, The Kominsky Method
Sacha Baron Cohen, Who is America
Jim Carrey, Kidding
Donald Glover, Atlanta
Bill Hader, Barry
Michael Douglas, The Kominsky Method
Sacha Baron Cohen, Who is America
Jim Carrey, Kidding
Donald Glover, Atlanta
Bill Hader, Barry
Take what I was just saying about The Kominsky Method and use that to explain why Michael Douglas is going to win this award. He’s old-time Hollywood, the biggest star on the list, and that’s exactly who the HFPA loves to get to come to their party. The voters are super stoked that Douglas is doing a TV show (even though it’s on Netflix, which is like, the dream job for every actor) and one that’s funny at that. Also, the Globes often love to award the new kid on the block, more than any other awards do. So I’m fully expecting Douglas to win tonight and thank CZJ. My vote would be for Sacha exposing how disgusting American politics is, but his show is likely too controversial. I think the biggest competitor for Douglas is Hader, who is simply sensational in Barry, like you have never seen him and would never expect. It’s ridiculous how good he is. But the real winner in my book is Ted Danson, who is not nominated in the biggest shanda of the entire award season. No matter who is snubbed even for the Oscars, it won’t compare to not recognizing that Danson’s performance as Michael on The Good Place is the pinnacle of perfection in sitcom acting. It seems like it’s just him doing what comes natural to him, and that’s a testament to how much thought he actually puts into every intonation and every little hand gesture to make Michael so fully fleshed out (even though his flesh doesn’t contain human juice OR goo) and so hilarious. Too good for the Globes, I say!
BEST TV COMEDY ACTRESS
Kristen Bell, The Good Place
Candice Bergen, Murphy Brown
Alison Brie, GLOW
Rachel Brosnahan, The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel
Debra Messing, Will & Grace
Kristen Bell, The Good Place
Candice Bergen, Murphy Brown
Alison Brie, GLOW
Rachel Brosnahan, The Marvelous Mrs. Maisel
Debra Messing, Will & Grace
FORK this was a hard one to alphabetize! So many damn B’s! (bees?) I’d say the voters just started at the top of the list of eligible performers and ticked off the first ones they saw, but they are actually all pretty great. This is hundo p Brosnahan’s, as she is simply marvelous as Maisel. And I’m great with that, because I adore her. I’d be happy though with any of three B ladies winning: Brosnahan, Bell, or Brie. Bell is entirely wonderful in The Good Place – no one else could turn what seem like basic (YA BASIC) lines into absolute hilarity (“sounds like your friend is one pickle short of…a pickle party”) and be a terrible person and yet so likable. And Alison Brie should be a household name for how good an actor she is, it’s almost sick how good she is. Her performance as Zoya the Destroya’s twin sister is reason enough to vote for her. I realize that saying Candice Bergen and Debra Messing have already had their time and their chance (and their awards) sounds mean and ageist, but they have LITERALLY already had their time and chance FOR THESE EXACT SAME SHOWS. Don’t get me wrong, the shows are two of my all-times, but this whole revival thing is getting old. Can the people who are so dead-set on reviving old classic TV shows instead focus the revival effort on Broadway so we can get a gottamn third musical revival this season???
Well, that’s all I have to say about that because like you I’m getting exhausted with myself. As for the limited series categories, Darren Criss and the Gianni Versace movie will win everything it can. People love that shit. The supporting actor and actress in a TV show categories are utter bollocks so it’s best we remain civil and just skip them. (Although I’ll be happy for Henry Winkler (loves him) and Alex Borstein winning.) If you made it this far, congratulations, you probably have the stamina to actually watch the Golden Globes! Enjoy!
‘I Love You, You’re Perfect, Now Change’ Filmed at London Coliseum: A Great Example of How to Film a Stage Show
It’s Theatre Thursday! Well last night was, for the press night of the new filmed theatrical production of I Love You, You’re Perfect, Now Change, from Lambert Jackson Productions and the London Coliseum, available to watch for this weekend.
The new filmed stage production of Joe DiPietro & Jimmy Roberts’ musical I Love You, You’re Perfect, Now Change, directed by Kirk Jameson, is the rare streamed production of the past year that made the most of its dual status as both a stage show and a film. It still felt stagey, with all the raw edges and intimate casualness of theatre, but made the most of being pre-filmed, with quick changes between settings, costumes, and characters amplifying the short vignette style of the show. The style let each scene feel like a unique story despite only using the four actors the show calls for.
I Love You, You’re Perfect, Now Change (that’s the last time I’ll type that whole title out) is the 1997 Off-Broadway musical consisting of vignettes – mostly very funny, some sad – about love and relationships. From dating to marriage to widowhood, the musical shared insights into universally felt moments of hilarious cringe from the dating scene as well as semi-poignant thoughts about long-term relationships, in a way that audiences heavily related to, at least in the ’90s. Some parts are dated, from the opening number’s line about Sweet’N Low and Half & Half (I swear tg I have not heard about Sweet’N Low since my dad stopped stealing them in bulk from the deli in the year 1999), to the entire scene with the divorcee making her video for the old VHS dating services (which I had to explain the existence of to my husband, my knowledge of course coming from that one episode of Full House where Joey makes one in the basement). This production modernizes other parts, as recent productions have, inserting necessary lines about phone apps and swiping in certain directions, as well as replacing one original scene with one about dick pics. Although I don’t mind shows embracing the times they were written in, I also didn’t mind these fairly innocuous updates to avoid being too much of a period piece.
Luckily, the humor I remembered from this show remained. (Although, at the beginning I got nervous. I didn’t quite get the framing device, with the creepy church sounds and vampire movie music. We did this show in college, and I did not remember anything spooky or creepy, so the first minute or so of Halloween noises and sermons made me question all my memories and experiences but fortunately it segued into fun musical theatre pretty quickly.) From the first awkward date to, well, the next awkward date, because the awkward dates provide the funniest material, the show made me laugh quite a bit. It’s super quirky (that’s the The Word for describing it), often weird af, and overall enjoyable, especially with the help of a great cast. Simon Lipkin (replacing Trevor Dion Nicholas from the initial announcement and I haven’t found out why yet and I hope Trevor is okay because what a guy), who is always a riot even as a creepy carnival barker (Assassins, not Carousel), is in top comedic form here, especially as the lawyer in the “Satisfaction Guaranteed” scene, something perfectly suited to his goofy-yet-intimidating-yet-fun schtick. Oliver Tompsett, another one of our fave West End guys, comes off equally well as long as he’s not saying ‘lasagna’ in a, what, Chicago? accent? Please don’t. His scene with Alice Fearn as two undatable nerds realizing they’re perfect for each other is a great show of zero ego (he looks ridiculous) and all talent.
Alice Fearn and Brenda Edwards get to show off as well, playing virtually the entire range of adult female character types. Their duet “Single Man Drought” was one of the definite highlights of the production, with their strong voices and stage presence convincing you it was a power anthem despite the context of the material.
A dip in energy came from the end of the first ‘act’, with the scene of the gay couple that felt vaguely homophobic, like very 1990s with the ‘acting gay’ thing (also the baby talk-into-sort-of-rap was a musical low point, woof), through the wedding and into the married couple vignettes, probably because the dating world is just funnier than the married world. Married problems are serious and sad! But the steam picked up again with the other highlight of the night, Tompsett’s gorgeous “Shouldn’t I Be Less in Love with You?” I mean, it’s like Cassidy Jansen was off in the wings about to forgive him for screwing up Romeo & Juliet by belting her face off. (That’s an & Juliet joke.) This one song and his performance ended the typical second act doldrums of many musicals from this era. Just beautiful.
The final scene of the widows meeting at a funeral was objectively sad in content, but it didn’t capture the emotion it aimed to. Something about it felt off, maybe a bit forced to have us immediately need to form an emotional impression of characters we have no connection to, and also yeah Lipkin sounds like a pretty Jewish name but his old New York Jew impression still felt…wrong to me. But with the joyous, catchy finale and its wonderful four-part-harmony introduction to the title song (once you get past the creepy church noises again), the show ended on a pleasant high note. Overall, it’s a solid production of this quirky (there we go again) show that tries to be goofy and ridiculous as often as it tries to be serious and important, where overall it just makes for a pretty good time.
